bohemiancoast: (Default)
bohemiancoast ([personal profile] bohemiancoast) wrote2010-03-30 01:47 pm

Bondage and Knitting redux

probably a less exciting post than you would think from the title.

A month or so ago there was a little flurry about the number of bondage items at the Eastercon. I pointed out that the issue wasn't that the number of panels, it was the lack of relevance to SF/fantasy. I suggested that it would be quite wrong to have that many knitting items, and gave the example of a sock knitting workshop as the sort of specialised event that would be quite inappropriate to have at the Eastercon.

I then was informed first that there are in fact as many knitting items as bondage items, and second that there will be a sock knitting workshop at Eastercon. I expressed some surprise at this and was told that items of this kind were there because con members had volunteered them.

Today I was reading, on another site, a thread about knitting at the Eastercon. In that thread a knitter explained that she had been approached to do a sock knitting workshop, but had declined -- and she was glad that the committee had found somebody else.

Sock knitting -- like the specialist bondage ties they're having workshops on -- is not a beginner skill; this isn't a 'have a go and try out something new' workshop, it's a specialist workshop for established knitters to develop their skills.

How many SF/fantasy items do you think you will find at a knitting convention? (There might well be one -- a knit a dalek/tardis/clanger type thing, which the Eastercon is also having and which I think is entirely appropriate).

You know, there is scarcely any fannish programme, fan history programme or fanzine programme at this convention. I've talked to fans who are equally concerned about areas of SF/fantasy that they are interested in and that are under-represented. And yet we have dozens, perhaps hundreds of items on topics that have no relevance to SF other than that 'fans like to do them'. And yet, the same committee members who are ignoring swathes of the core of the hobby are going to considerable lengths to develop programming relating to non-SF hobbies.

We need to take some action here, chaps. This group of people have asked to run the Eastercon again in 2012; some of them are influential in the 2014 Worldcon bid (I should stress that I have no concerns about programme for that convention). This isn't a 'general way for geeks to hang out with agreeable company and do interesting geeky things', it's the National SF convention. We should ensure that it is so; that it reflects, in an ecumenical way, the broad SF/fantasy interests of the membership, and that the non-SF items represent an interesting alternative to the main events rather than the main activity.

[identity profile] fjm.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:40 pm (UTC)(link)
The mode of programming this year was to go up to people and demand to know what they wanted to do. I suspect that I am not the only person to have listed a number of things. The only one taken up was a none sf related workshop. I protested vicferously and was told there was no roomon literary items. I carried on protesting and was eventually give stuff about sf. Then I saw the programme and realises why there was no space for me on sf items ( I reckon none-sf : sf is 3:2). I have done my best to help out by withdrawing the none-sf workshop.


If we can find space, a number of us are up for some guerrila programming.

[identity profile] ms-cataclysm.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 01:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Perhaps an excursion to see some SF London locations which would get round the space issue ? Most of the ones I can think of offhand are riverside .
ext_267: Photo of DougS, who has a round face with thinning hair and a short beard (Default)

[identity profile] dougs.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 03:31 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm in favour of guerilla programming, if there's a good technique for getting the word out -- if, for example, the newsletter team is amenable.

[identity profile] miramon.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
If the newsletter team are not amenable (and frankly I have doubts) then a guerilla newsletter can be arranged.

[identity profile] flick.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 06:29 pm (UTC)(link)
The newsletter team? with that editor?

Now *a* newsletter team, on the other hand....
Edited 2010-03-30 18:30 (UTC)

[identity profile] frostfox.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 07:07 pm (UTC)(link)
The pencil for The Fillo of Snark is poised in my sweaty hand, poised I tell you.

FF

[identity profile] gaspode.livejournal.com 2010-03-31 07:19 am (UTC)(link)
*whispers quietly* as long as its not to the detriment of the con and done in fun i'd almost actively encourage this *sneaks off quietl*

[identity profile] frandowdsofa.livejournal.com 2010-03-31 10:52 am (UTC)(link)
There was a spoof at one of the Paragons that was absolutely brilliant. They must have had a room full of tech. There were regular issues, it picked up on the style of the official one, it was distributed by ninjas. Content was spot on. We never did find out who did it, all the usual suspects denied it loudly and with some jealousy. Some of them even assumed we'd done it ourselves, using the same software and fonts.

I think they realised that if we knew who they were they would have a job for life.

[identity profile] bohemiancoast.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I love the fact that you have three replies to this (now four) and they are *all* from Plokta cabal members...
ext_267: Photo of DougS, who has a round face with thinning hair and a short beard (Default)

[identity profile] dougs.livejournal.com 2010-03-30 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)
If only the cabal had some newsletter experience.