Effectively "well-fed" here is being used to say "has eaten the widest variety available to them". If you turn down a third of what is available to you then by *that* definition you're not well-fed.
Sure: if your definition of well-fed definitively includes eating meat or fish, people who don't aren't well-fed. It's a circular argument, and it's as true as most circular arguments.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
winterfish
no subject
Date: 2004-12-20 01:57 pm (UTC)Sure: if your definition of well-fed definitively includes eating meat or fish, people who don't aren't well-fed. It's a circular argument, and it's as true as most circular arguments.