bohemiancoast (
bohemiancoast) wrote2003-02-24 01:04 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Syndicating Macadamia
I thought that only paid users could syndicate feeds, but it turns out free users can too (just not very many). If you're one of the people who has fretted in the past that I maintain a blog as well as an LJ, my blog is now syndicated as
alisonscottblog. So you can, if you like, add it to your friends list; the blog posts will appear inline in your friends page. No lj-cuts, of course, and sometimes the posts can be quite long by LJ standards. (It suddenly occurs to me that there's no particularly good reason why the LJ-cut tag wouldn't work; it should be ignored by web browsers, and interpreted by LJ. I will try it next time I post to the blog, if I remember.) I have it on *my* friends list, so that if you comment on the blog in LJ, I'll see the comments.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-syndicated.gif)
no subject
Oh, good - this is a good idea, I think!
no subject
(and if this comment has posted 4 times blame LJ's current crapness)
no subject
Oh that's great to know. A couple of times now I've read stuff on the feed, wanted to comment and then remembered that it wasn't the actual article. By the time I remember to go to the main blog I've forgotten what I wanted to say/been distracted by other stuff.
no subject
no subject
Is this syndicating thing common? I'd never heard of it till you showed me it. It interests me in terms of legal liability...
no subject
Legality seems clear for sites that provide a feed for syndication! However, there are some sites (like Neil Gaiman's) that don't, but where a third party has used a script to create a syndicated feed. My guess is that the legality of that sort of tool is much more dubious.