Mandarins 'r' us
Jun. 14th, 2002 06:00 pmFor those of you who have been waiting with bated breath to here the results of my promotion board, I have good news.
I will be joining the ranks of the senior civil service. Just as soon as I find myself a job.
Oh, yes, and I appear to have been drinking for four hours.
I will be joining the ranks of the senior civil service. Just as soon as I find myself a job.
Oh, yes, and I appear to have been drinking for four hours.
no subject
Date: 2002-06-15 02:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-15 03:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-15 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-15 06:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-15 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-15 06:37 am (UTC)Oh, it was worth a try...
no subject
Date: 2002-06-15 07:08 am (UTC)Anyway, congrats! (What grade is that again?)
CC
Not that I'm gradist
Date: 2002-06-15 08:22 am (UTC)We were all sitting around in the pub, when one of my colleagues said, 'you know, you could be a permanent secretary', and I laughed and when I finished laughing they said 'no, really, you're what, 36, do you really think you're not going to get promoted in the next 24 years, and you look just like a young (and here they named one of our youngish Grade 2s) to me". It still strikes me as unlikely. The whole way progression works is that you get promoted and promoted and promoted, and then suddenly you don't get promoted any more and that's it. And this could easily be it for me. On the other hand, I've gone from being 'decidedly superannuated for an HEO(D)' to 'by no means a high-flying G7' to 'really a rather young G5'. So I need to think about what it all means and what I might want out of life. Beyond, you know, splendid, supportive, sexy
At any rate, I'm thinking about following the lead of high-heeled
Re: Not that I'm gradist
Date: 2002-06-15 09:47 am (UTC)Change your name? Okay, I guess. I've known you always under the same two names (come to think of it, bohemiancoast isn't one of them, though it connects to one). Expect a lot of slippage--the disadvantage of having anything like a history or past accomplishments, and a bunch of people who know you, is the same as the advantage: you're known by a name.
I assume it would still be Alison something? (I figure I can post this much, since LJ identifies you as "Alison.")
Re: Not that I'm gradist
Date: 2002-06-15 10:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-15 08:05 am (UTC)Dunno
Date: 2002-06-15 08:39 am (UTC)Re: Dunno
Date: 2002-06-15 09:28 am (UTC)Re: Dunno
Date: 2002-06-15 01:18 pm (UTC)Of course, SMOF/NATO rank equivalence fell into abeyance after the Glasgow Worldcon bid was filed. And besides, no bodies were ever found.
Whatever,
Re: Dunno
Date: 2002-06-17 02:52 pm (UTC)So I think it's safe to say your position in the Overall Government Pecking Order is well above that of
MC, standing smartly to attention
no subject
Date: 2002-06-15 12:45 pm (UTC)(but Just as soon as I find myself a job.... not likely to be a problem, I hope?)
Getting a job
Date: 2002-06-15 03:49 pm (UTC)I don't want to move until the piece of work I'm doing at the moment is finished, but that might be in as little as 3-4 weeks.
Meanwhile, apparently they're going to talk us through the range of vacancies, and then we choose one or more to apply for. My ex-boss has a job in mind for me, too, and is waging a propaganda campaign to try to get me to apply for it.
I am, broadly speaking, picky; I probably want to keep my current working hours (30 hours over 4 days) and continue to work overwhelmingly in London. But I still don't think it's going to be a problem.
Re: Getting a job
Date: 2002-06-15 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-06-17 02:27 pm (UTC)MC